|
Hi Reader ever thought about becoming a scientist in a company?
An R&D Scientist (Research and Development) position is the corresponding role to a Postdoc in academic research.
With better pay and regulated hours, that could be your dream.
However, the circumstances are different – let’s explore whether this is something for you:
|
|
|
The Key Difference
A main difference that will reappear again and again in this course is the different aim of academic research versus R&D in industry.
Academic research is primarily fueled by novelty — and then publications. It is the desire to uncover new knowledge, generate insights, and explore uncharted territory.
Industry, however, is driven by goals and outcomes.
Well-defined targets - such as developing a product, increasing revenue, or capturing a market - are the objective. Novelty only matters if it contributes to these goals.
This is why your work as a scientist is structured very differently in these environments:
|
|
|
Ownership
In academic research, it’s all about you - you are the expert in your project and the main driver of progress.
In industry, the project is “owned” by the company.
That means you work with a team of people from several departments. You have a clear function to fulfill, and your colleagues rely on you.
However, it also means that if leadership decides the research question will not contribute (e.g., to a new drug), it can be rapidly discontinued. Some companies also rotate you after a set time so you don’t get too close to a specific topic.
Moreover, research in industry is linked to clear deadlines, budgets, roles, and expectations. But in established companies, equipment and opportunities are much less limited by money.
|
|
|
Standard Operating Procedures
In academia, researchers value doing things “their way.”
Flexibility rules. That also means it’s common to improvise and iterate: an experiment might lack a proper control, require repeating, or simply be omitted from a paper if it didn’t work out.
For a company, irreproducible results translate into regulatory risks, lost time, and wasted money. This is why industry labs insist on SOPs (standard operating procedures), detailed record-keeping, and validated methods to ensure that any scientist could reproduce a result.
In other words, you don’t just optimize a protocol after a workday — you will have regular meetings with your team to decide which experiments to conduct and follow established steps for how to do them.
|
|
|
Work-Life Balance and Schedules
Academic culture often demands overwork. Long hours in the lab, weekend experiments, and late nights finishing grant applications are commonly accepted norms.
In industry, clear labor laws exist — your workday will often revolve around a 9-to-5 schedule. There will be overtime, but this is documented, kept within limits, and compensated either through pay or time off.
|
|
|
Completion of Projects
In academic research, we often raise more questions than we answer with our work. Seldom is a project truly finished. This means you can work for 50+ years on just a few questions.
In industry, this is radically different. As mentioned, questions raised must contribute to a product or service — this is why projects are time-limited. However, that also means you may experience the very satisfying feeling of reaching the finishing line with your team. If all goes well, you will see how your work contributed to a product or service that helps people around the globe.
|
|
|
My Personal Tip
Doing research in industry has a clear structure, is more team-focused, less spontaneous, and contributes to a clear outcome.
You often have newer equipment, and you don’t have to organize yourself — but your project is determined from the top.
These are not all the differences, but they are key points you should know.
I’ll also share my personal take - including the question of work contracts and a tip for you.
|
|
|
